DOJ Epstein Files Reignite Debate Over Ripple and XRP Origins

The U.S. Department of Justice has released millions of pages of files linked to Jeffrey Epstein. Soon after, parts of the crypto community began to study them. The focus quickly turned to Ripple and XRP. Some readers believe the documents suggest early interest in these projects. Others say the claims go too far. As a result, an old debate has returned. It centers on whether powerful figures tracked Ripple and XRP from the start.

The “Secret Bitcoin Project” Claim

One file dated July 1, 2014 mentions an informant telling Epstein that Jed McCaleb was working on a “secret Bitcoin project” after leaving Mt. Gox. This line caused a stir. Some XRP supporters think it shows Epstein had someone watching Ripple and XRP in their early days. They argue this points to hidden influence or monitoring.

But a different view relies on timing. McCaleb co-founded Ripple in 2012 and left in 2013. In 2014, he helped launch Stellar. Because of this, analysts say the “secret Bitcoin project” likely means Stellar, not Ripple or XRP. The dates line up better with Stellar launch than with Ripple early work. So, while the wording sounds mysterious, it may not refer to XRP at all.

Emails Reveal Early Crypto Rivalries

Another document drew attention for a different reason. It shows a 2014 email from Blockstream co-founder Austin Hill to Epstein and others. In that email, Hill argued that Ripple and Stellar were harmful to the crypto space. He urged major backers to reduce or stop funding them. He also said supporting Bitcoin projects and these networks meant “backing two horses in the same race.”

This email doesn’t prove control or secret deals. Still, it shows how divided the industry was even then. Bitcoin focused groups saw Ripple and Stellar as threats. These old rivalries shaped public views and investor behavior. They also explain why today’s community reacts strongly to any link between Epstein and early crypto projects.

Reactions From Ripple Figures

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz responded to the resurfaced files. He said the idea of treating XRP or XLM supporters as enemies hurts the whole industry. He warned that this mindset deepens division. David also noted there is no proof Epstein had direct ties to Ripple, XRP or Stellar. No meetings or deals appear in the files.

Epstein Files Spark Debate Over Alleged Early Monitoring of #Ripple and $XRP.🧵🧵🧵 pic.twitter.com/c2HiGBATx5

— TheCryptoBasic (@thecryptobasic) February 2, 2026

David added that the documents may be only “the tip of a giant iceberg.” Still, he urged caution. He stressed that people should not jump to conclusions without clear evidence. Many community members agree. They say the files show interest and debate, not control.

What This Means for XRP Today

The Epstein files highlight how early crypto attracted attention from many sides. They also reveal how strong opinions shaped the market. Yet, they do not prove hidden hands behind XRP’s creation. Currently, the story reflects old tensions, not new facts. In 2026, the debate shows how history still shapes crypto narratives. Also, once again, Ripple and XRP sit at the center of it.