Michael Egorov Says Debate Is Vital for DAO Success
Michael Egorov says debates in DAOs are healthy, boosting voter turnout and improving Curve governance decisions.
Quick Take
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
Michael Egorov says DAO disagreements are healthy and encourage active participation.
The December 2025 Curve vote achieved over 80% turnout after community pushback.
Revised proposals, like a $6.2M CRV grant, show how debate improves decision-making.
High engagement ensures DAO governance reflects the community, not just a few token holders.
Curve founder Michael Egorov says disagreements within DAOs are a sign of healthy governance. He pointed to a December 2025 governance vote that saw unusually high participation after the community initially rejected a proposal. Egorov explained that debate and pushback can strengthen decisions and boost engagement.
Michael Egorov Highlights the Value of DAO Disagreements
According to reports, Egorov noted that conflicts in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are not a problem. Instead, they show that members are actively thinking and participating. The December vote followed an earlier proposal that faced broad criticism from the Curve community. After revising the proposal, over 80% of eligible voters took part in the decision, far exceeding turnout in most DAO votes.
Therefore, this high engagement demonstrates that controversy can encourage members to participate. Egorov emphasized that open discussion and criticism lead to stronger governance decisions and more accountable protocol management.
The December Curve Vote
The vote involved a revised $6.2 million CRV token grant to Swiss Stake AG for development work. The initial proposal had faced pushback due to concerns over allocation and transparency. After listening to community feedback, the proposal was adjusted, which sparked intense discussion and drove turnout to 82% of eligible voters.
Analysts say this level of participation is unusual in DeFi. Many DAOs experience voter apathy, with typical turnout under 20%. Moreover, Curve’s experience shows that thoughtful debate and revisions can energize a community, making governance more effective.
Michael Egorov Explains Why Debate Strengthens Governance
Egorov highlights that disagreement doesn’t harm a protocol—it can make it stronger. Constructive debate helps members identify potential issues and push for improvements. High voter turnout ensures that decisions reflect the entire community, not just a few large token holders.
Lessons for DeFi Governance
Michael Egorov’s comments highlight a broader trend in decentralized finance. Controversy, when managed constructively, can improve governance and build trust in protocols. High participation in votes ensures that decisions reflect the community’s priorities, rather than a small group of token holders.
By encouraging discussion and revisions, DAOs like Curve are showing how decentralized organizations can mature. The example of the December vote illustrates that disagreement can lead to better outcomes.
Follow us on Google News
Get the latest crypto insights and updates.
